It might be challenging to decide which hosting is the best for you to choose. When it comes to comparison, many things you should take consideration.

Once you have decided whether to choose Fatcow or Bluehost for your web hosting, now it’s time for the comparison. Seem you have read all the ‘traditional’ reviews, we’ll show you difference point of reviews easily for you to compare which one is the best. Let’s check out what is the differences between Fatcow and Bluehost. First thing first!

FEATURES

There is the most important features you should take a look before purchasing any hosting. From table above, you can see that Fatcow offered more ‘Unlimited‘ features compare to Bluehost. You can host as many email as you want at Fatcow but not at Bluehost. If you planning to create thousands of FTP accounts (what for?), then Bluehost is not the right choice for you. Here is the big thing, MYSQL! If you are webmaster or web developer, you should look for unlimited mysql database. It’s good for long run when you need to develop clients’ sites and might used more than one database.

MONTHLY PRICE

As you can see, Fatcow win for the lowest monthly fee, 0.28 cent cheaper than Bluehost. But still, people are looking for the cheapest!

TWITTER SEARCH RESULTS

Here is the results for Positive tweets for Fatcow and Bluehost hosting on Twitter. Click on hosting name below for more details review for each.

DAILY AGGREGATE TWEETS

BLUEHOST twitter account already suspended! So, no results for them. But from my collection, Bluehost didn’t send any of their team on Twitter. This account most probably a FAKE Account and that’s why it has been suspended.

But Fatcow still stand up and feed all their clients with answering question, troubleshooting and updating with their latest updates and news. Here is the aggregate daily tweets on Fatcow.

Want to get closer with Fatcow? Follow Fatcow on Twitter.

TRENDISTIC

Above is graph about Bluehost and Fatcow trends on Twitter. It’s a dynamic graph and you’ll be viewed the latest results about both trends. From the result above, we can see that Bluehost lead once before the got suspended. But Fatcow remains and maintain their trends weekly. What if Bluehost didn’t get suspended? Hmmm..

CONCLUSION

As a conclusion, we can see that most of the results were sided with FATCOW. There’s not so much difference between both hosting meantime, but when it’s come on Twitter review, Fatcow almost won all. We know that BLUEHOST the best hosting for wordpress blog as it has recommended by wordpress.org itself. So which one you should go for? The recommended by wordpress.org or the most leading hosting company on Twitter? Back to you, for the long run, if there’s anything happen to your hosting, do you want to wait for traditional support ticket or get faster response time with the latest Twitter technology. Make a wise decision!

Visit Fatcow Fatcow Review	Visit Bluehost Bluehost Review