<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fatcow or Bluehost?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twthosting.com/fatcow-or-bluehost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twthosting.com/fatcow-or-bluehost/</link>
	<description>Twitter Based Web Hosting Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:31:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: freddy jr</title>
		<link>http://twthosting.com/fatcow-or-bluehost/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>freddy jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twthosting.com/?p=1199#comment-247</guid>
		<description>clear, and really explained.
aggree with ur conclusion even it&#039;s not transparent. u cant get faster response from big hosting companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>clear, and really explained.<br />
aggree with ur conclusion even it&#8217;s not transparent. u cant get faster response from big hosting companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
